Agentik produces three creative assets for $0.90

• Agentik connected 374 tools from 35 providers through one connection, according to hasantoxr's Agentik demo, and exposed image, video, research, scraping, and SEO capabilities to existing agents.
• The three quoted jobs total $0.90: $0.08 for fashion, $0.18 for perfume, and $0.64 for a burger reel, with the itemized prices shown in the fashion prompt, the perfume prompt, and the burger prompt.
• Every run showed its price before execution and waited for approval, while Agentik's pricing post lists spending caps and a prepaid, 0% markup model.
• The tool list names GPT Image 2, Seedream 5.0 Pro, FLUX.2 pro, Veо 3.1, Kling O3 Pro, Seedance 2.5, Exa, Firecrawl, and OpenAlex in hasantoxr's catalog breakdown.
• The linked catalog describes 391 tools from 36 providers, a different count from the 374 tools and 35 providers in the demo, as shown by Agentik's catalog.

Agentik's catalog combines creative models with web research, scraping, and SEO calls. The demo puts a visible price gate in front of each generation, including the $0.64 burger video in hasantoxr's burger run. The official MCP server documentation describes the same underlying pattern: an AI application discovers callable tools, then requests execution with user controls available at the application layer.

Agentik gave Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and ChatGPT access to a shared tool connection, according to hasantoxr's post, rather than limiting the workflow to one model vendor's native image or video features.

The inventory spans four useful categories:

• Images: GPT Image 2, Seedream 5.0 Pro, and FLUX.2 pro.
• Video: Veo 3.1, Kling O3 Pro, and Seedance 2.5.
• Research: Exa, Firecrawl, and OpenAlex.
• SEO and market data: Google SERP, keyword volume and CPC, and backlink data.

The numbers need a timestamp attached to them. Hasan's post counts 374 tools from 35 providers, while the linked Agentik catalog describes 391 tools from 36 providers. The supplied materials publish both counts without reconciling them.

The aggregation pattern is spreading beyond media generation. An independent MCP guide describes one server that connects an AI app to Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Threads.

The interface displayed a provider, a price, and an approval step before the tool ran. The burger prompt explicitly asked Agentik to show the price and wait for approval, and the post says all three runs followed that pattern, according to the burger workflow.

Agentik's stated billing mechanics are:

• $5 in free credit for eligible new accounts, with no card required.
• 0% markup, with the user paying the provider's price.
• No fee on a first top-up of $10 or less.
• Spending caps per key.

Those details appear in hasantoxr's pricing post, which frames the prepaid balance as a guardrail against an agent continuing to call paid tools unattended.

The MCP server concepts documentation defines tools as schema-described functions that can call APIs, modify files, or trigger other logic. It also lists approval dialogs, permission settings, and activity logs as application-level controls, giving Agentik's price-before-execution behavior a familiar protocol shape.

The demo's creative test is easy to reproduce as three separate jobs:

1. Fashion campaign: an editorial image of a model in an oversized cream hoodie in a minimalist concrete studio. Agentik selected Grok and quoted $0.08, according to hasantoxr's fashion prompt.
2. Perfume product shot: a luxury bottle on black marble with golden lighting and realistic reflections. The selected tool was GPT Image 2 at $0.18, shown in hasantoxr's perfume prompt.
3. Restaurant reel: a vertical, eight-second slow-motion video of a cheeseburger being assembled. MiniMax H3 Max Turbo was quoted at $0.64 in hasantoxr's burger prompt.

The quoted calls add up to $0.90. The prompts also show the agent choosing different providers per medium instead of forcing every asset through the same generation model.

The evidence includes a separate Codex workflow that continues after generation. AmirMushich's pipeline moves from project context and an automated screencast through a publication skill, reel preparation, headline, music, cover, caption, review, Buffer API delivery to Instagram, live-post verification, and archiving, according to AmirMushich's workflow.

Another creator connected Flora MCP to Claude and produced a transparent Porsche 911, with a follow-up saying Codex can use the same connection, as lloydcreates's Claude result and lloydcreates's follow-up show. A separate post from gizakdag contains five floral fashion images and the single-word caption “Go!”, but supplies no tool, price, or workflow detail in gizakdag's visual post.