Skip to content
AI Primer
workflow

LLMJunky says Opus 5.5 made a 36-minute educational film

LLMJunky says Opus 5.5 made The History of Light using multiple media services for more than $200. The 36-minute film required human steering and used JavaScript animations instead of the attempted Veo clips.

4 min read
LLMJunky says Opus 5.5 made a 36-minute educational film
LLMJunky says Opus 5.5 made a 36-minute educational film

TL;DR

  • Opus 5.5 reportedly wrote and produced a 36-minute educational film: LLMJunky put the spend at more than $200.
  • The final animations were JavaScript, according to the creator's clarification; none of the attempted Veo 3.1 clips made the cut.
  • Opus selected the music and image tools itself, LLMJunky explained in a reply. The human prescribed Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS for narration.
  • The production included human supervision: LLMJunky periodically watched and steered during the early stages.

The narrator was meant to have a distinguished English accent from a century ago. Opus called in judges to choose the music and voice, then gave itself end credits.

The History of Light

LLMJunky gave Opus permission to use API keys in their keychain to generate voices, imagery, video and explanatory motion graphics. The creator described the experiment as a way to make bespoke educational films for their children.

The History of Light, posted by LLMJunky, runs 35 minutes and 37 seconds.

The production brief

The published prompt combined a history syllabus with specific production constraints:

  • History: Who studied light, what people believed at each stage, who dissented, and how long those beliefs persisted.
  • Physics: The experiments behind those debates, with an in-depth treatment of particle-wave duality.
  • Narration: Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS, with a slow, distinguished English accent “from 100 years ago.”
  • Writing and code: Only Opus 5.5, using high reasoning, for both the story and programming.
  • Iteration: Work until “excellence,” with as many subagents and tokens as needed.

The published brief specified neither a target runtime nor a dollar cap.

JavaScript animations

Opus tried Veo 3.1, but none of those clips survived into the final cut. It wrote the final animations in JavaScript, the standout creative choice in this production.

Veo 3.1 generates eight-second clips with native audio, according to Google's documentation. LLMJunky did not give a reason for excluding the attempted clips.

Voices, music and images

Five media models supplied assets, according to LLMJunky's production account:

  • Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS: Narration.
  • Lyrica 3: Background music.
  • GPT Image 2.5: Scene imagery.
  • Nano Banana Pro: Scene imagery.
  • NB2 Flash: Scene imagery.

Only the TTS model was prescribed by the creator; Opus selected the other tools itself.

Judges for music and voice

Opus tried alternatives and launched judges to pick the musical score and voice, LLMJunky said. The creator described that trial-and-error process as one of the impressive parts of the run.

Google documents regional accents and consistent voice identity across multi-minute narration for Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS. Those are vendor-described capabilities, separate from the creator's account of how Opus selected the audio.

Human steering

LLMJunky described several boundaries around the delegated production:

Spending and unfixed flaws

LLMJunky attributed the unexpectedly high spend to giving Opus too much freedom with API keys. They said the project did not necessarily require that much money.

The run used roughly 30-40% of their weekly allowance, LLMJunky estimated in another reply. They left the flaws unfixed because the project was already expensive, describing their own contribution as guidance rather than repairs.

Anthropic's Opus 5.5 launch pricing lists standard API rates of $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens. LLMJunky's post gives an overall project spend rather than a service-by-service bill.

Excalidraw-style artwork

For a separate joke chart, LLMJunky said they asked GPT Image 2.5 for “Excalidraw art style.” The same image model appeared in the film's asset list.

Further reading

Discussion across the web

Where this story is being discussed, in original context.

On X· 6 threads
TL;DR2 posts
The History of Light2 posts
Voices, music and images1 post
Human steering3 posts
Spending and unfixed flaws3 posts
Excalidraw-style artwork2 posts
Share on X