0xInk reports Higgsfield used campaign clips without permission in Unlimited Seedance ads

• 0xInk_'s original post says Higgsfield used their videos in Instagram ads for an "Unlimited Seedance Month" campaign without permission.
• In a follow-up, 0xInk_'s mistake update said Higgsfield called it a mistake.
• 0xInk_'s later update says Higgsfield agreed to delete the Instagram posts, and that the posts were removed.
• Replies from 0xInk_'s research reply and 0xInk_'s association reply add the core grievance: 0xInk_ said they did not want their work, or their name, associated with Higgsfield.

0xInk_'s original post turned a promo push into a consent fight fast. Then 0xInk_'s mistake update said Higgsfield framed it as an error, 0xInk_'s later update said the Instagram posts came down, and 0xInk_'s template reply suggested the campaign may have been using a broader creator template.

0xInk_ said Higgsfield used their clips on Instagram without permission, adding that they had never used the platform and had never replied to Higgsfield's DM.

In a reply to BLVCKLIGHTai, 0xInk_'s reply about DMs said money was not the issue, and that the problem was seeing their work used to promote a platform they disliked.

The public sequence is short. First came the complaint, then 0xInk_'s mistake update said Higgsfield called it a mistake, then 0xInk_'s delete request post said they were asked to delete the complaint, and finally 0xInk_'s later update said Higgsfield agreed to remove the Instagram posts.

0xInk_ also wrote that "the damage is already done," which is the line that sticks after the takedown.

One reply adds a detail that did not appear in the first complaint. According to 0xInk_'s research reply, Higgsfield said the clips were used "for research."

That did not settle the dispute. In 0xInk_'s association reply, 0xInk_ said, "It’s okay no worries, but I don’t want to be associated with them," which shifts the fight from simple attribution to brand consent.

Asked what tools they use instead, 0xInk_ named a stack that included Flora, Magnific, Invideo, Runway, Midjourney, and Running Hub in 0xInk_'s tool list, while 0xInk_'s Flora and Magnific reply and 0xInk_'s follow-up tool reply repeated Flora and Magnific.

• Flora
• Magnific
• Invideo
• Runway
• Midjourney
• Running Hub

That gives the dispute one extra creative-industry wrinkle: the creator at the center of the campaign blowup says they were not even using Higgsfield in their own workflow.