Suno users report missing Audio Influence slider and refund approvals

• According to Numerous_Judgment_50's slider complaint, a Suno Pro subscriber trying to clean up an uploaded track could not find the promised Audio Influence control at all, even after logging out and back in.
• In the thread under the same Reddit post, one commenter said the slider is web-only and does not work on newer models, while another suggested non-maxed settings instead of putting every control into the red.
• Particular_Bird7375's audio-issues post described a separate audio regression, a forced high whooshing sound that did not appear in an older WAV workflow for the same track.
• Refund frustration showed up fast: Outside_Musician_903's complaint attacked Suno's red-error blocks, and their follow-up post said Google Play approved a full €30.99 refund.

Numerous_Judgment_50's slider complaint is about revision control, not music generation quality in the abstract. The useful detail is narrower: a paying user went looking for a cleanup workflow and could not access the specific knob other users kept recommending. At the same time, Outside_Musician_903's refund post turned the platform's red-error friction into a billing story, while this Diablo 4 GMV on YouTube shows another user still using Suno as a raw-material generator before heavy manual editing.

The post starts with a narrow job: keep a v4.5 song basically intact, remove artefacts, and avoid the model drifting into a different track. Instead, the user says Suno produced songs that sounded unlike the upload and sometimes added even more artefacts.

The thread adds two practical details. The embedded comments under the post say the slider may be web-only, and one commenter claims it does not work on newer models. Another commenter gave a settings recipe, audio 85, style 50, weirdness 15, which suggests users are treating cleanup more like prompt steering than like a deterministic restore pass.

The louder complaint thread is less about one missing control and more about repeated failed attempts to use the product at all. Outside_Musician_903 described the experience as paying €30 a month to experiment while hitting a recurring red error wall.

That complaint turned into a refund datapoint within hours. In the follow-up post, the same user said Google Play approved a refund for the full €30.99 subscription, and a commenter in the thread asked whether anyone else had managed to get money back too.

Particular_Bird7375's separate audio post points at another version of the same trust problem: the user said Suno now forces a high whooshing sound that destroys exported audio, even when comparing against an earlier file path for the same track.

One creator post in the same window lands very differently. HMB_JackylTTV says they used Suno to generate raw sounds, then spent weeks splicing, editing, and using AI to smooth the final result for a Diablo 4 fan video.

That workflow is more revealing than the celebration around it. The song was not a one-shot generation. It was a long assembly process: generate stems or fragments, wait for lyrics to click, then finish the track through manual editing and video production. The finished example is here: Diablo 4 GMV.